Campaigners Lose High Court Challenge Over Stonehenge Tunnel Plans
New Setback for Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site
Campaigners advocating for the protection of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site faced a significant blow as they lost a High Court challenge against the approval of plans for a road tunnel near the historic landmark. The Transport Secretary, Mark Harper, supported the proposal for a two-mile tunnel to upgrade a section of the A303, a decision that had been previously overturned by the High Court due to environmental concerns.
Legal Battle Continues
Despite their efforts, the Department for Transport (DfT) reapproved the construction of the tunnel from Amesbury to Berwick Down in Wiltshire. The Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site (SSWHS) group brought their case to the High Court in London last year to contest the decision. However, in a recent ruling, Mr. Justice Holgate largely rejected their arguments, stating that most aspects of their case were unfounded.
Environmental Impact Assessment Scrutinized
One key point of contention raised in the legal battle pertains to the DfT’s handling of the environmental impact assessment. While the majority of the campaigners’ assertions were dismissed, this particular issue will be revisited in the future. Mr. Justice Holgate emphasized that the ministers had appropriately considered relevant policies, undermining the campaigners’ claims of oversight.
Conflicting Perspectives
David Wolfe KC, representing SSWHS, criticized the Government for allegedly failing to explore viable alternatives and providing inadequate information regarding the project’s impact on heritage sites. In contrast, James Strachan KC, representing the DfT, defended the decision, stating that the project aligned with the UK’s international obligations and aimed to mitigate potential harm.
Government’s Justification
The Government justified its support for the tunnel by highlighting the overall benefits of the scheme, emphasizing the improvement in journey times and the reduction of visual and noise pollution near the monument. Despite initial concerns raised by Planning Inspectorate officials, the Government remains steadfast in its position that the benefits outweigh the perceived harms.
Controversy and Opposition
This development follows a series of controversies surrounding the project, including previous legal challenges and objections from heritage conservation groups. The future of the Stonehenge tunnel project remains contentious, with ongoing debates regarding its necessity and long-term implications for the historic site.
FAQs
Q: What was the recent outcome of the High Court challenge regarding the Stonehenge tunnel plans?
A: The campaigners lost the High Court challenge against the renewed plans for a road tunnel near Stonehenge.
Q: What were the main concerns raised by Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site (SSWHS) regarding the tunnel project?
A: SSWHS criticized the Government’s approach to the environmental impact assessment and the alleged lack of consideration for heritage sites.
Q: How did the Government justify its decision to approve the Stonehenge tunnel project?
A: The Government argued that the benefits of the project, including improved journey times and reduced visual and noise pollution, outweighed the potential harms to heritage assets.
Q: Who were the legal representatives involved in the High Court battle over the tunnel plans?
A: David Wolfe KC represented SSWHS, while James Strachan KC represented the Department for Transport (DfT).
Q: What role did then-transport secretary Grant Shapps play in the approval of the tunnel project?
A: Grant Shapps initially approved the project in November 2020, despite concerns raised by Planning Inspectorate officials about irreversible harm to the area.
